Blog

Signs Your Team Is Ready for Food Safety Software

Food safety systems don’t break all at once. They wear down slowly. One more binder, one more spreadsheet, one more person who “knows where the file is.” For many FSQA teams, the turning point comes when the cost of patching holes starts to outweigh the cost of fixing the system.

Here are the clearest signals we hear from managers who’ve made the switch.

1. Audits have become fire drills, not checkpoints

If an audit triggers weeks of prep, that’s a red flag. Auditors notice too. They expect continuity, not a rush of signatures and updates the week before. With SQF Edition 10 and BRCGS Issue 9 now stressing ongoing monitoring, sites that rely on last-minute catch-up are under pressure.

2. Supplier documentation is fragmented

It starts small: a COA in email, a risk assessment in Excel, an approval form in a binder. Over time, it becomes unmanageable. The risk isn’t just missing a file, it’s failing to prove continuity of supplier monitoring.

What auditors ask: “Show me the current approval, the last COA, and any corrective actions.” If those live in three different places, retrieval time becomes the test.

3. CAPAs don’t close, they recycle

Most teams can log a corrective action. The real test is whether it stays closed. If you see the same issue reappear, or if your spreadsheet is full of overdue CAPAs, that’s the system telling you it’s not working.

Advanced practice: Leading plants now hard-code verification steps into the CAPA workflow (swabs, repeat inspections, photos). A CAPA without proof can’t be closed.

4. Training records don’t prove competence

Sign-in sheets and attendance logs worked five years ago. Not anymore. Auditors now ask: “How do you know this person is competent?” That means being able to show what was taught, when, and how it was evaluated.

Real impact: One site was hit with a major finding because their records showed training attendance, but no evidence of verification. It wasn’t about whether people were trained, it was about whether the record could prove it.

5. Growth makes the cracks wider

What feels “fine” at one site collapses at two. New staff, new products, or a second facility multiply the paperwork burden. Shared drives and binders don’t scale.

Common trigger: A new customer audit or retailer requirement. Teams realize their existing system can’t provide the visibility buyers now expect.

The Bottom Line

The right time to move off spreadsheets isn’t after a finding or a recall. It’s when you start recognizing these patterns: audits that feel like fire drills, CAPAs that never stay closed, supplier files scattered, training records under scrutiny, or growth exposing gaps.

Where Certdox Helps

Certdox was built by FSQA professionals who lived these problems. It centralizes supplier approvals, CAPAs, training records, and audit documentation into one system. That makes compliance a daily habit, not a yearly scramble.

With Certdox, teams get clarity, control, and confidence. Audits stop being events. They become proof of what’s already happening.

[Schedule a walkthrough] or [Explore Certdox modules]